Dingpolitik: from an interview with Bruno Latour. Link: re-public: ing democracyRe-public. K.K.: You talk about the demon of the. By the German neologism Dingpolitik, we wish to designate a risky and Latour introduces the stakes of incorporating objects into politics. Bruno Latour. In Bruno Latour & Peter Weibel (eds.), Making Things Public. MIT Press. pp. Van Realpolitik naar Dingpolitik.B. Latour – – Krisis
|Published (Last):||4 October 2008|
|PDF File Size:||4.16 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||2.12 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
From realpolitik to dingpolitik
Where the web 2. Added to PP index Total downloads 9of 2, Recent downloads 6 latourr 1of 2, How can I increase my downloads? What change does it make in the way people make up their minds to be attached to things? Sign in to use this feature.
From Realpolitik to Dingpolitik – An Introduction to Making Things Public |
No categories specified categorize this paper. While often in history, this advice has been taken too literally in the shape of spheres and domes, maybe it is time to look for other places of publicity, than the rather archaic town halls, churches and parliaments.
Latour continuous by pointing out that another mistake made in Western political history is that it focused on settling differences, instead of trying to co-evolve with dingpolihik set of indifferences.
How do they manage to bring in the relevant issues? The “End of Ideology” Revisited: The Origin of Political Liberty in Confucianism: And the point of these references? Here he makes the argument for disagreement and cohabiting, especially with indifferences.
Perspectives for an Alternative Parliamentarism. Metz – dingppolitik History of Political Thought 3 2: But how to get form objects to matter-of-concerns to things? Matt Sleat – laour Political Theory 42 3: Latour – – Krisis 2: How can this be achieved?
In this article, politics and public space are discussed, where the claim is made that perhaps we need a shift towards the politics of things in order to re-map politics.
Where objects used to be looked at as a dkngpolitik matters-of fact, this is false, or at least too narrow of a view on the matter.
In the second, it is the re-presentation of the object in relation to those who observe it science, technology. How are all involved parties, people and things assembled? Find it on Scholar. It is time to go back to things.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University’s proxy server Dingpolitij custom proxy use this if your affiliation does not provide a latouur. Atmospheres of Democracy, Cambridge: Taking these things back into the design loop is one of my missions, with the statement in mind that the way content is created and consumed has at least as much importance as the technology driving it.
While always describing the how, and the procedures around the issue, when it comes down to what the issue is, political philosophy has remained silent throughout history.
Dingpolitik and an internet of things | Masters of Media
This brings us back to shoving stuff in a room…though how this is “eloquent” is anyone’s guess. Where this has up to now never been looked into as being political, objects are. This entry has no external links. Return to Practice Literature. No keywords specified fix it. Van Realpolitik naar Dingpolitik.
Legitimacy in Realist Thought. While one might claim that the actors in this setting are the human beings organizing this assembly, Latour claims that the influence of things have an even role in creating this assembly. Sungmoon Kim – – History of Political Thought 29 3: Especially when these things, being digital or physical, are capable of sharing, posting, editing, deleting content.
To continue, this brings in another problem: There is a need to investigate how and through what medium the matters of concern are discussed. Please Visit Reserve Page.
Although ordering things in time has been quite sorted out, we now have to move into anew territory: He seems to be saying that openness is a prerequisite to Actor-Network Theory. First of all by altering the view on the form and metaphor of state. Everything has become contemporary. Christopher Norris – – Philosophy and Social Criticism 17 1: This page was last modified on 24 Novemberat