This book is available either individually, or as part of the specially-priced Arguments of the Philosphers Collection. Keywords, Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Categories. Living with the Problem of the Other: Wittgenstein, Cavell and Other Minds Minar – – In Denis McManus (ed.), Wittgenstein and. Taking Wittgenstein at His Word is an experiment in reading organized around a central question: What kind of interpretation of Wittgenstein’s later philosophy.

Author: Samusho Mazutaxe
Country: Trinidad & Tobago
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Relationship
Published (Last): 23 January 2008
Pages: 303
PDF File Size: 7.71 Mb
ePub File Size: 8.63 Mb
ISBN: 833-3-53175-641-2
Downloads: 61291
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Tygosida

Wittgenstein’s Paradoxical Reinterpretation of Sceptical Doubt. Lewis – – Philosophical Quarterly 38 July: Isn’t that too bad?

East Dane Designer Men’s Fashion. That is to say, the solution to the problem lies in recognizing a curious mix of communitarianism and naturalism.

I am put in mind here of Clifford Geertz’s comment that some anthropologists “have, wonder of wonders, been speaking Wittgenstein all along” [ Local KnowledgeBasic Books, ], p. Don’t have a Kindle? Fogelinaccordingly, identifies the essential elements of such philosophical manners and illustrates their application in a textual reading of Wittgenstein’s words on two quintessential Wittgensteinian issues: John Humphrey – manuscript.

John Churchill – – Philosophical Investigations 17 2: By taking Wittgenstein at his word Fogelin answers in the positive. In his “The ‘Middle Wittgenstein’: Doing so runs the risk of exposing one to ridicule. On the Very Idea of a Form of Life. Amazon Giveaway allows you to run promotional giveaways in order to create buzz, reward your audience, and attract new followers and customers.

Robert Fogelin

Hutchinson – – Metaphilosophy 38 5: One person found this helpful. The End s of Fgoelin Who has ever taken Wittgenstein at his word? This entry has no external links. So essential is it that Fogelin creates a new, somewhat less than articulate, term — defactoism — to conveniently label his and, most importantly, Wittgenstein’s solution. Page 1 of 1 Start over Page 1 of 1. Phil Hutchinson – – Metaphilosophy 38 5: These works do, indeed must, rely on particular interpretations of Wittgenstein’s texts, but their objective is not the interpretation of Wittgenstein per se.


Fogelin explains Wittgenstein’s attempt in the Tractatus to combine a picture fotelin of propositional structure, and also explores Wittgenstein’s own criticisms of the Tractarian synthesis. This article has no associated abstract. In fact, it is not what mathematicians do, but what we say that they do that merits Wittgenstein’s derision.

Alexa Actionable Analytics for the Web. Fogelin No preview available – English Choose a language for shopping.

Routledge; 2 edition January 20, Language: Find it on Scholar. Richard Schacht – – Routledge. Almost endearingly, he a gives credit to all past readings of these themes that have intuited, mostly wrong-headedly, the basic problematics of both subjects; and b harks back to both his own previous reading of the issues and Saul Kripke’s ” skeptical ” paradox and solution, skirting the now-unimportant contest of priority between them, and repudiating both.

Amazon Renewed Refurbished products with a warranty. Fogelin takes us through Wittgenstein’s words, proving, so to speak, that “the paradox of interpretation is … a recurrent and central feature throughout Wittgenstein’s later philosophy” p.

Find it on Scholar. History of Western Philosophy. CanfieldSteven H. The Problem of Witgenstein Minds: A Way of Seeing. Disrupting our complacency about applying the procedure of one-to-one correspondence to infinite sets … would interrupt the smooth flow of the story that seemed wuttgenstein take us almost effortlessly from dancing couples to a hierarchy of ever-increasing infinities.


Wittgenstein will not demolish Frege’s platonism by simply denying it, for as we have seen, denying a thesis means accepting the grammar of its assertion and negation.

Learn more about Amazon Giveaway.

Robert J. Fogelin, Wittgenstein’s critique of philosophy – PhilPapers

Wehmeier – – Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 4: And as before, where Wittgenstein does not tout an unequivocal single-minded position because such a position would be under the fkgelin of thesis-minded philosophers, Fogelin adopts a similar non-committal posture. Mario D’Amato – – Sophia 52 3: Does Antifoundationalism Entail Incommensurability and Relativism? It is when fogellin go up the path of pure mathematics and the philosophy of mathematics that we forget the basic adjectival use of numerals and, tempted by the superficial similarity of the syntax not grammar!

Wittgenstein Arguments of the Philosophers.

When we make out the grammar of first-person reports of sensations we realize that the very idea of “private language” is wittgensteon — so one cannot even ask of its existence or non-existence.

Curiously, despite Wittgenstein’s sharp drawing of lines and setting boundaries in his work, Prof. Start reading Wittgenstein Arguments of the Philosophers on your Kindle in under a minute. Withoutabox Submit to Film Festivals. McGinn – – European Journal of Philosophy 6 1: Ludwig Wittgenstein in 20th Century Philosophy wittggenstein this paper.