A Arvore Do Conhecimento – Humberto Maturana e Francisco Varela. A árvore do conhecimento: as bases biológicas do entendimento humano. Front Cover. Humberto Maturana. Editorial Psy, – pages. arvore do Conhecimento, A: As Bases Biologicas da Compreensao Humana: Humberto Maturana: Books –
|Published (Last):||15 December 2012|
|PDF File Size:||11.42 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||15.38 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Complexity in inherent of living things, how simple unicelular being evolved to more complex ones and how the nervous system works. And I think that this is the main difficulty. May 17, David rated it it was amazing Shelves: I’d have been cool with it if he had had the results and methods to back it up like Newton did, only he wasn’t such a dick about itbut he didn’t.
Francisco Varela – Cytowania w Google Scholar
A mixture of dated scientific ideas, profound frameworks for thinking about living organisms, and unnecessarily complicated jargon, ToK is essentially the children’s menu version of Maturana and Varela’s Autopoiesis and Cognition papers on living organisms, communication, and consciousness.
Referring to a unity implies an act of distinction. The ” Tree of Knowledge” offers a strong and coherent theory about how simple principles of life eventually generate cognition and ultimately the conscious process of “knowing how we know”. The external pain is a trigger only. This quotation and the entire final chapter can be found at http: On a lighter note, it’s funny to see orthodox scientist having their minds blown by stuff philosophers have been talking about since Hume, like the fact that conscience is not, by any means, a unified whole, but rather a “bundle of perceptions” made coherent by self-regulating mechanisms.
The theory is built from scratch to explain the natural emergence of these phenomena in biological systems, and it leads us to beautifully conclusion that the mind is shared, it emerges in social contexts and love is the guiding force of the phenomenon.
Its authors present a new view of cognition that has important social and ethical implications, for, they assert, the only world we humans can have is the one we create together through the actions of our coexistence. All in all, a book that’s almost quite completely entirely unlike a something that is superficially similar to a masterpiece. Published March 31st by Shambhala first published On one side there is a trap: Reproduction the conhecimeto of a unity to create two unities of the same classhowever, is necessarily historical.
I am not saying this justifies anything of my faith which I really don’t know how to justify but conheimento does sit well. Maturana, along with Francisco Varela and Ricardo B. Aus heutiger Sicht ist die “neue” Denkweise eventuell nicht ganz so neu. Mar 03, Moana Avvenenti rated it liked it.
We experience reality as autonomous unities in “structural coupling” with the environment which, for each of us, include other beings as well.
The result will be a history of mutual congruent changes as long as the autopoietic unity and its containing environment do not disintegrate: I know that may seem like a petty complaint, given ravore nature of the book, but this is major leagues conceit we are talking about.
Conversely, each time we refer to a unity in our descriptions, ddo are implying the operation of distinction that defines it and makes it possible.
As regards its continuous interactions with the environment, the cell unity classifies them and sees them in accordance with its structure at every instant. It can never be solved in the domain where it takes place if the disputants are ‘certain. Conhecimetno can be easily demonstrated. Elementary nervous system — sensory surface, motor surface, system of coordination between surfaces i.
This book succeeds at using a relatively accessable framework and accessable language to lead the reader through what fonhecimento quite challenging and perhaps counter-intuitive ideas about autopoesis and cognition. To ask other readers questions about Tree of Knowledgeplease sign up. For me conehcimento good parts constitute the last two chapters and the afterword. If you are interested in cybernetics, whole systems, evolution, epistemology, or any related discipline then this book would be at home on your bookshelf.
We indicate this process when we call the organizations that defines them an autopoietic organization. Jul 15, James rated it did not like it. It is not just that we are different because we learned different things.
As it is, the book comes across as an armchair philosopher’s qrvore flamboyant attempt to reform science, which is weird, because I know the author is a fairly renowned scientist, who has published a decent number of pretty relevant empirically-based books such as “The Biology of Cognition”. One of those rare books that are a lil hard to read but ones that change ones outlook to life.
This book is most likely going to totally change your perspective on what it means to know. arbore
I’m going to bring my cabbages to someone who understands my needs. This describes an entirely new direction in understanding living symmetries and relational hypersystems. Adaptation in response to a single change in the environment affects the organism in a global way. Our experience, however, is one of creative freedom; and in the way we see things, the behavior of higher animals seems unpredictable.
Disciplina Complexidade, Conhecimento e Sociedades em Rede
Other people who don’t have previous experience with biology and sociology might enjoy it, but still I would have liked to see more addressing of higher logical types in these sections. Jan 04, Oliver Hodson rated it conhecimfnto was amazing.
Recommended to zynphull by: Want to Read Currently Reading Read.